As always in Gaul, they love to disguise sharp Islamophobia by calling it the “Separatism Law” instead of the “Islam Law.” So be it; it fools no one anyway, neither in France nor in the rest of the world.
French Politics
Unlike my father, I have never been very political. He would gladly get into heated arguments during family meals over his convictions. Personally, my only certainty is that French political parties no longer exist. Did they ever truly exist, for that matter? What remains in this moldy country is that same old shitty refrain of wanting to hide everything under a war against Islam. All united, from left to right, in the crusade. Mosques are a threat, the beard is a threat, the veil is a threat… polygamy is a threat! Globalists, therefore, take great delight in spreading their security-focused rhetoric and their terror of Covid-19.
The Moralizers Are Back…
Banning polygamy is already utter nonsense and part of the culture of injustice so dear to France. But hypocrisy is being blown out of proportion to hide the real issues. Among them, the fact that men do not take responsibility for having multiple partners, and they are backed by the law in doing so.
Mistresses of married men are therefore wronged upon their death, deprived of any recognition or inheritance. Why fight against a social fact? Something that has been established for centuries and even clearly accounted for by the laws and cultural foundations of peoples—why oppose it? For the “liberation of Women”? But in what way does this make her more free?
This is the most ridiculous contribution your feminists have brought: the death of marriage, the death of responsibility.
This is, in fact, the very clear struggle led by Marlène Schiappa, who declares she sees nothing wrong with “polyamory” or “throuples,” yet seeks to ban plural marriage…
Aurélien Taché’s Remarks: Scourged by the Media
When this “cute” anti-separatism law finally took aim at polygamy, some tried to realign the approach, realizing that many French people were going to find themselves screwed. This was the case for MP Aurélien Taché, who stated at the time that he did not understand the Republic’s interference in matters concerning people’s way of life. Naturally, after being flattened by the steamroller of state communication, he retracted his statements.
The Separatism Law: Let Us Separate!
After years of bringing families together with family reunification laws, they have decided to reverse course and drive in the wrong direction. Polygamy now sends us to prison. Anyone with one or more other wives abroad will be barred from entering the territory. Anyone maintaining multiple wives within the territory will be liable to a prison sentence. The question remains: on what grounds will France judge that these are indeed multiple marriages, since no paperwork can prove it? Since marriage in France can only unite two people, how can one prove that it is not just a passing fling, or the famous “polyamory”?
Concretely, we are fed up with all this mess. Nonsensical theories transformed into laws! France no longer wants us, but what on earth would we go there for? This country has represented nothing to anyone for a long time. I founded my family in a land, Mali, which respects its culture and grants rights to women.
And furthermore…
Finding myself in prison because I am a man—a real one? The deculturation of masculinity is in full swing. Men are no longer men, and women are forced to become them to survive. Behind this separatism law hides the ongoing destruction of the family, among other things.
The Premise of the Separatism Law
During the tragedy of Zyed and Bouna in Clichy-sous-Bois, it was suggested that polygamy was a vector for criminality. You will notice that when an absurdity is relayed in the press, it is never for nothing. Newspaper headlines are there to pave the way. Similarly, in the case of the Rassemblement National, their shock rhetoric only serves to prime the masses to agree when the time comes. They “Islamize” purely French problems; they “Africanize” the failure of the Republic. This deceitful law, which is itself the introduction to a sequence, is the fulfillment of these preparations. As for me, I knew all along that a small place of one’s own is better than a grand place in someone else’s home.